Technical Data Compliance Evaluation — what QA looks for

. DO/SEL. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.5. Chief Inspector. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.6. QA evaluator(s) who awarded the rating. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.7. Trainer/instructor of applicable task. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.8. Flight Commander/Chief. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.9. Section OIC/NCOIC. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2. The board will cover, and QA will document the following: 7.2.5.11.2.1. An overview of the unsatisfactory performance. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.2. Technician(s) and/or team evaluation history. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.3. Unit’s related unsatisfactory ratings for trend analysis. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.4. Root cause(s). (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.5. Corrective actions. (T-2) 7.3. Maintenance Standardization & Evaluation Program (MSEP). QA will assess unit compliance and look for areas to improve unit performance. (T-1) The program is established in a manner tha

g and qualification program. (T-1) The training will be tailored to the group commander’s focus areas and unit needs. (T-2) Ensure the program: 7.2.2.13.1. Requires personnel selected as evaluators to: 7.2.2.13.1.1. Be qualified on QA evaluator and work center CFETP tasks associated with any operation the evaluator inspects or evaluates. (T-2) The QA OIC/SUPT can authorize technical subject matter expert (SME) to assist QA evaluators who are not qualified on work center CFETP tasks. Personnel designated as a technical SME should, to the maximum extent possible, not be from the same work center as personnel being evaluated. 7.2.2.13.1.2. Possess a 7-skill level or above and be qualified to conduct QA evaluations on the applicable nuclear weapons certifiable tasks identified in Table 7.4. (T

aluator Proficiency Evaluations on each inspector. (T-2) 6.4.13.1. Evaluators Proficiency Evaluation (EPEs) will be conducted while the Chief Inspector assesses one Personnel Evaluation (PE) and one technical inspection (QVI/Special Inspection (SI)). (T-2) 6.4.13.2. Each QA Inspector, permanent or augmentee, must pass both EPEs prior to performing unsupervised evaluations and inspections. (T-2) 6.4.14. Document QA Inspector training in the MyTraining. (T-2) 6.4.15. Ensure each discrepancy/finding within rated inspections, evaluation, and observation reports have been assigned both a Category (CAT I or CAT II) and a Finding Severity (Maj or Min). 6.5. Quality Assurance Inspector Responsibilities. QA Inspectors will: 6.5.1. Evaluate flightline and back shop maintenance tasks/inspections and

ntify, validate and/or resolve quality, proficiency and/or compliance issues impacting mission generation. The evaluation and analysis of deficiencies and problem areas identified are key functions of QA that highlight and reveal underlying causes of poor quality in the maintenance production effort. Aircraft and equipment condition and personnel proficiency are validated through the MSEP and recorded in the Logistics Evaluation Assurance Program (LEAP) QA database. Civil service and contracted personnel are to follow requirements established in their respective civilian position description/contract and accepted quality assessment system. 6.2. Responsibilities. QA is responsible to the MXG/CC or equivalent to perform as the primary technical advisory agency for maintenance actions and to

e conducted while the Chief Inspector assesses one Personnel Evaluation (PE) and one technical inspection (QVI/SI). 4.4.9.2. Each QA Inspector, permanent or augmentee, must pass both EPEs prior to performing unsupervised evaluations and inspections. 4.4.9.2.1. QA augmentees require an annual EPE on either a PE or technical inspection. 4.4.9.3. Document QA Inspector training in AF approved electronic training records. 4.5. QA Inspector Responsibilities. QA Inspectors will: 4.5.1. Evaluate maintenance tasks and inspections to include items identified by the KTL/RIL. (T-2) 4.5.2. Enter inspection and evaluation reports into the MAJCOM-approved QA database. (T-2). 4.5.3. Perform QA review of TCTOs/TCTIs, OTIs, modification proposals, Deficiency Reports (DRs), AFTO Form 22s, instructions and su

LOGISTICS READINESS FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 18 Chapter 1 GENERAL PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1.1. Purpose. The purpose of the LR QA program is to provide the unit commander/civilian director and senior leadership with an assessment of the unit’s ability to perform key logistics processes by ensuring standardized, repeatable, technically compliant process execution, while promoting a culture of professional excellence and personal responsibility. The program’s primary focus is on personnel proficiency and adherence to established policy and procedures. 1.2. Scope. The LR QA program is focused on enabling and strengthening commanders’ mission effectiveness and efficiency. QA evaluators should possess the ability to be critical, communicative, creative, and cognitive with the capability to m

spector’s proficiency in conducting a PE or QVI. The EPE will be accomplished by QA Supervisors or designated leads to ensure the QA inspector appropriately conducts the PE or QVI while ensuring job proficiency and compliance with technical data requirements (e.g., tools, equipment, WCDs, safety, technical data, material, FOD, training, etc.) during the performance of a specific maintenance task without assistance. Each QA inspector, permanent or augmentee, must pass one EPE evaluating a PE and one EPE evaluating a QVI on their qualification. EPEs will be rated pass or fail and given a QAR rating. HQ AFSC will ensure ALCs develop comprehensive EPE processes and procedures. 8.3.4.3. Quality Verification Inspection (QVI). A QVI is an assessment/evaluation of a maintenance procedure, process,

rations and processes. However, QA Inspectors will not evaluate completed welds unless certified IAW TO 00-25-252, Intermediate and Depot Level Maintenance Instructions, Aeronautical Equipment Welding. (T-2) 4.7.5. QA Augmentation. If a functional area does not warrant a full-time position in QA, but specialized expertise is required, qualified technicians may be selected to perform augmentee duties. QA must maintain a listing of current augmentees. 4.8. Maintenance Standardization and Evaluation Program (MSEP). The purpose of the MSEP is to provide units with a method of evaluating technical compliance and to measure how well they comply with established standards. 4.8.1. A MSEP will be developed and executed to ensure programs, processes, maintenance technician proficiency, equipment con