Flightline Vehicle Inspection — what QA looks for

classified systems. (T-2) 14.5.2. First Look Requirements. The First Look report is an internal wing document intended to highlight potential maintenance-capacity and operational-requirement disconnects in the upcoming year. Every year, NLT 15 March, PS&D will coordinate with MMA, flightline and backshop maintenance work centers to provide PS&D with historical attrition and projected manning production. (T-2) This assessment will take into account personnel, facilities, and airfield infrastructure for each aircraft maintenance organization. 14.5.2.1. In wings operating aircraft supported by a sortie production model, PS&D will coordinate with the Unit Maintenance Supervision to establish local requirements, responsibilities and procedures for utilizing the model to develop, sustain or ref

aluator Proficiency Evaluations on each inspector. (T-2) 6.4.13.1. Evaluators Proficiency Evaluation (EPEs) will be conducted while the Chief Inspector assesses one Personnel Evaluation (PE) and one technical inspection (QVI/Special Inspection (SI)). (T-2) 6.4.13.2. Each QA Inspector, permanent or augmentee, must pass both EPEs prior to performing unsupervised evaluations and inspections. (T-2) 6.4.14. Document QA Inspector training in the MyTraining. (T-2) 6.4.15. Ensure each discrepancy/finding within rated inspections, evaluation, and observation reports have been assigned both a Category (CAT I or CAT II) and a Finding Severity (Maj or Min). 6.5. Quality Assurance Inspector Responsibilities. QA Inspectors will: 6.5.1. Evaluate flightline and back shop maintenance tasks/inspections and

. DO/SEL. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.5. Chief Inspector. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.6. QA evaluator(s) who awarded the rating. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.7. Trainer/instructor of applicable task. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.8. Flight Commander/Chief. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.9. Section OIC/NCOIC. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2. The board will cover, and QA will document the following: 7.2.5.11.2.1. An overview of the unsatisfactory performance. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.2. Technician(s) and/or team evaluation history. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.3. Unit’s related unsatisfactory ratings for trend analysis. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.4. Root cause(s). (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.5. Corrective actions. (T-2) 7.3. Maintenance Standardization & Evaluation Program (MSEP). QA will assess unit compliance and look for areas to improve unit performance. (T-1) The program is established in a manner tha

ue Receipt, or equivalent. 9.3. General Program Guidelines. 9.3.1. Conventional munitions work centers are not required to establish centralized support sections or tool rooms. Tool kits, HAZMAT, and other support items may be located in the munitions maintenance area at the discretion of the flight chief. Custodial control will be maintained by personnel in the maintenance area. (T-1) When in a munitions maintenance- controlled area, other than flightline areas, such resources will be considered secured. 9.3.1.1. FOD discovered outside flightline areas in CTKs, equipment, and vehicles will be considered a Category (CAT) II minor finding for QA evaluation and inspection criteria. 9.3.1.2. CAT II minors will be documented for trends but will not be counted against the AQL. (T-2) 9.3.2. In a

udited and annotate any findings (T-1). A4.2. QA Manager Responsibilities in Specific Areas of FM. Periodically the QA Manager will be tasked by AFAFO or MAJCOM/AFIMSC/DRU/FOAs to complete QARs on items of interest. Likewise, the QA Manager must conduct on-going QA reviews to assess organizational performance. These locally determined QARs can be based on the QAMs observation of mission needs; comptroller’s discretion; suggestions from FM staff; the section’s directives, guides, and regulations; self-assessment items; cross-feed items; latest training; FIAR events; etc. The QA Manager must look across all FM and use risk management to ensure priority areas are accounted for in these QARs. The following are standardized requirements and areas of interest in the different sections. Together

et, the team process breaks down the existing procedures and looks for ways to streamline or improve the overall process. Discussions during QA or other staff meetings are ideal times to initiate a team review. The team’s composition may include members from other agencies that are involved in the study (i.e. personnel, transportation, contracting, etc.). 4.7. Quality Assurance Meetings. A face-to-face QA meeting between the comptroller, section chiefs, and QA Manager is required at least monthly (T-1). The meeting is a means to focus on QA efforts at the comptroller organization. It allows the section chiefs an opportunity to state the health of their operations directly to the comptroller. The meeting is also a good forum to understand the current issues in the other areas. 4.7.1. The QA

en a SELM trained maintenance team must dispatch to the facility to ensure proper configuration. Re-accomplish Last Look Inspection IAW paragraph 4.8.7. 4.8.7. Conduct Last Look Inspections IAW the SELM T.O. and this instruction. The Last Look Inspection team will conduct a Last Look Inspection at each test LF prior to Last Line Isolation, and at each test LCC immediately after Last Line Isolation. (T-2). 4.8.7.1. The Last Look Inspection Team will consist of, at a minimum, SELM MNX OIC or NCOIC, and SELM-qualified QA personnel. The Last Look Inspection will verify (T- 2): 4.8.7.1.1. Proper connection of all SELM test equipment. 4.8.7.1.2. Proper safing of applicable AVE. 4.8.7.1.3. Proper installation of all SELM cables. 4.8.7.1.4. Missile safing pins are installed. 4.8.7.1.5. Proper inst

ill interview and collect information from the facility occupant(s) concerned with the IAQ. A4.3.2. BE and PH will review historical information and assessments of the facility. If warranted based on the interviews, BE may find useful EH hazards data and information concerning CE operations, flightline activities (e.g., noise, exhaust, electromagnetic frequency emitters, etc.), or environmental compliance programs (e.g., DoD and non-DoD air emissions, Installation Restoration Program sites, etc.) in GeoBase. A4.3.3. BE and PH will conduct a facility walkthrough (inside and outside) and look for improper HVAC system function and cleanliness, adequate fresh air supply, evidence of water leaks, damage, and mold growth, or individual employees’ sources of poor air quality. BE and PH will also