Forms & Documentation Review — what QA looks for

. DO/SEL. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.5. Chief Inspector. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.6. QA evaluator(s) who awarded the rating. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.7. Trainer/instructor of applicable task. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.8. Flight Commander/Chief. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.1.9. Section OIC/NCOIC. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2. The board will cover, and QA will document the following: 7.2.5.11.2.1. An overview of the unsatisfactory performance. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.2. Technician(s) and/or team evaluation history. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.3. Unit’s related unsatisfactory ratings for trend analysis. (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.4. Root cause(s). (T-2) 7.2.5.11.2.5. Corrective actions. (T-2) 7.3. Maintenance Standardization & Evaluation Program (MSEP). QA will assess unit compliance and look for areas to improve unit performance. (T-1) The program is established in a manner tha

n Program (MSEP). QA shall assess unit compliance and look for areas to improve unit performance. (T-1). The program is established in a manner that assists QA inspectors in readily identifying and tracking all minimum inspection and evaluation. QA will review and update the plan quarterly in association with maintenance managers. (T-1). QA will ensure this plan includes applicable requirements from Table 7.3, Table 7.4, and Table 7.5. (T-1). When developing the plan, QA will:50 AFMAN21-200 9 AUGUST 2018 7.3.1. Address areas of concern identified by maintenance managers. (T-1). 7.3.2. Tailor the plan for each squadron, flight, or section mission. (T-2). 7.3.3. Include the following QA Focus Areas: 7.3.3.1. T.O.s, directives, and publications compliance. (T-1). 7.3.3.2. Maintenance document

classified systems. (T-2) 14.5.2. First Look Requirements. The First Look report is an internal wing document intended to highlight potential maintenance-capacity and operational-requirement disconnects in the upcoming year. Every year, NLT 15 March, PS&D will coordinate with MMA, flightline and backshop maintenance work centers to provide PS&D with historical attrition and projected manning production. (T-2) This assessment will take into account personnel, facilities, and airfield infrastructure for each aircraft maintenance organization. 14.5.2.1. In wings operating aircraft supported by a sortie production model, PS&D will coordinate with the Unit Maintenance Supervision to establish local requirements, responsibilities and procedures for utilizing the model to develop, sustain or ref

sors and members. (T-2) 11.25.11.4.3. Allow Phase 2 and Phase 3 training to be conducted utilizing joint sessions including 2F0X1 AFSC personnel and all maintenance AFSCs. (T-2) 11.25.11.4.4. Utilize both fuels (2F0X1) and maintenance AFSC instructors for joint sessions (T-2) 11.25.11.4.5. Be conducted by MT (QA if MT not available). (T-2) 11.25.11.5. QA hot pit certifying officials and QA hot pit certifier augmentees (squadron certifying officials) will train, evaluate, and certify unit personnel. (T-2) QA hot pit certifying officials will ensure augmentees conduct evaluations using procedures outlined in this instruction, applicable aircraft TOs and local procedures. (T-2) 11.25.11.6. DELETED. 11.25.12. Document training for personnel performing, evaluating, supervising, or instructing h

20-14. Note: PMELs are not required to use the Logistics Evaluation Assurance Program QA database to document Quality Reviews, Process Reviews, and Evaluator Proficiency Evaluations. 2.15.11. PMEL QA Evaluators may be delegated responsibility from Maintenance Group QA to perform PMEL special inspections (CTKs, TOs, hazardous material). PMELs will document Special Inspections considered part of the MXG MSEP in accordance with local guidance. (T-3) 2.16. PMEL Section Chief (Lab Chief) (or equivalent). The Section Chief is responsible for managing laboratory production demands to support the local mission and the PMEL Repair Network requirements. The Section Chief manages the PMEL training program and ensures maximum task coverage and technician proficiency. Along with the applicable general

d using a MAJCOM approved QA database. Civil service and contracted personnel are to follow requirements established in their respective civilian position description/contract and accepted quality assessment system. 4.1.1. For functions inherent to AFTAC Maintenance, QA will have at a minimum one 962 Subsurface Maintenance and one 963 Materials Maintenance SEI. 4.1.2. For functions not inherent to maintenance personnel, or for which there is a dedicated inspection office (i.e. Safety, or Training), QA should request the OPR to assist with assessments for materiel management functions. 4.2. Responsibilities. QA Inspectors have the authority to observe, correct and document applicable maintenance activities performed within the SPTG. QA will: 4.2.1. Implement and administer the MSEP, Product

fication proposals, Deficiency Reports (DRs), AFTO Form 22s, instructions and supplements. (T-2) 4.5.4. Provide training/instruction as applicable to address deficiencies identified during evaluations/inspections. (T-2) 4.5.5. Evaluate maintenance documentation and Site Jacket Files annually, in coordination with PSD&A. (T-2). ACCI21-1709 31 AUGUST 2023 29 4.6. QA Representative (QAR) Responsibilities. QARs are appointed by the QA Superintendent to perform inspections and evaluations at geographically separated locations. 4.7. QA Inspector Training. As a minimum, the local QA Inspector Training Plan will include the applicable items listed below to ensure QA program standardization. 4.7.1. Training must cover inspection and evaluation techniques, documenting inspection worksheets and actio

sis at Center-level prior to forwarding to AFMC/A4MY. AFSC/LG will provide AFMC/A4M a consolidated AFSC MSEP report by the 1st of the month (30 days after the end of the reporting period). 8.4. Quality Assurance Training. 8.4.1. HQ AFSC will ensure a standardized QA training program is developed and implemented. QA personnel will attend within 60 days of completing required On-the-Job (OJT) to conduct MSEP assessments. Document QA inspector training in individual training records or approved Maintenance Information System (MIS). QA training as a minimum will include: 8.4.1.1. CRXMAO0007000SU Depot Maintenance Quality Assurance (QA) Program. 8.4.1.2. CRXMAO0007100SU Logistics Evaluation Assurance Program (LEAP) (Module 1 – Evaluators). 8.4.1.3. CRXMAO0007102SU, Logistics Evaluation Assuranc