FC 4-171-06N is a Facilities Criteria document issued by Naval Facilities Engineering Command, current as of 5 September 2014 [FC 4-171-06N].
Purpose: FC 4-171-06N provides design criteria for Navy Operational Support Centers in support of the Navy mission. It outlines all required functional spaces and optional spaces in the facility, and provides guidance on key dedicated Navy spaces for Armed Forces Reserve Centers [FC 4-171-06N].
Scope and Application: The document provides functional requirements defined by users and operational needs for DoD Component facilities. All criteria in FC 4-171-06N must be met by resulting facilities, whether planning a conversion, alteration, addition, or new construction [FC 4-171-06N]. Design requirements must be used in addition to UFC 1-200-01, General Building Requirements, which identifies key unified facility criteria including accessibility, antiterrorism, security, sustainability, and safety [FC 4-171-06N para 3-1].
Unofficial — answered from indexed publication text, which may be incomplete or out of date. Your MAJCOM/unit supplement may be stricter. Verify the official PDF before acting or writing a finding.
DAFI 91-204 para 5.3, p. 46 (effective/current as of 2025-07-16)thority will only be executed by a commander; it will not be delegated to a vice or deputy commander, or below wing/delta commander. (T-1) 5.2.4. If Convening Authority responsibility is transferred, the accounting organization remains the unit of assignment for the damaged assets or injured personnel. 5.3. Events Involving Multiple Commands. Involved MAJCOM/FC commanders will determine which MAJCOM/FC will assume investigative responsibility and advise AF/SE within 24 hours. In general, the MAJCOM/FC whose asset initiated the event will assume investigative responsibility. However, if initially unclear, the MAJCOM/FC sustaining the highest level of loss in the event will assume investigative responsibility. The MAJCOM/FC commander may determine other compelling reasons exist for assigning
DAFI 36-2685 para 3.5.2, p. 16 (effective/current as of 2026-03-20)cal process. Note: ARC wing Command Chiefs will serve as the OPR and identify the appropriate member or position to manage these courses for their wing. 3.4.2. The DAs will conduct enough FC offerings to accommodate EPME prerequisite requirements for the installation and associated Geographically Separated Units (GSU) population. (T-1) 3.4.3. The DAs will execute FCs through IR or virtual IR synchronous delivery. Asynchronous training or DL does not meet the intent for the FC curriculum. 3.5. Foundations Course Tracking. 3.5.1. DAs will maintain student graduation rosters for a minimum of twelve months. DAs may provide certificates annotated with FC course codes and course title. 3.5.2. DAs will update Airmen’s FC completion in the Oracle Training Application (OTA) system of record based o
No supplement passage retrieved — check the supplement chain on the pub page before citing.
DoDI 2000.26 (effective/current as of 2019-12-04)vileges include the same privileges as user accounts as well as the ability to approve drafts SARs for release to an FC approver. (4) FC Approver. The FC approver account is reserved for the individuals assigned to an FC, whose duties are to evaluate incidents and perform other administrative functions with respect to the eGuardian system. The FC approver reviews and approves incidents to be released into the eGuardian system. An FC approver is a designated person who has received the required SAR analyst training. d. Application for Access Procedures. (1) Applications for access are routed through the respective DoD Component eGuardian program manager. (2) The program manager, or designated account manager, uses the “Pending Users” feature within eGuardian to approve or disapprove eGuardi